Compare reproductions
Grouped by theme, each result shown against the reference it was validated on. "not-checkable" means the paper reports no reproducible scalar to gate against — an honest first-class outcome (ADR-0058), not a failure.
Land cover & change
| reproduction | result | vs reference | tier | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MapBiomas LULC, fire, water — Rondonia (2023) | lulc overall accuracy 88.9% | — | human | validated |
| LandTrendr temporal segmentation — PNW (Kennedy et al. 2010) | not-checkable | Detecting trends in forest | recipe | unverified |
| Solar-on-forest trajectory similarity — Massachusetts | not-checkable | — | recipe | unverified |
Vegetation
| reproduction | result | vs reference | tier | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine Treeline Ecotone detection (Wei et al. 2020) | spatial correlation 98.1% | data/weiss_268_treeline.csv |
human | validated |
Hazards (fire, flood, vulnerability)
| reproduction | result | vs reference | tier | status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Climate vulnerability model for Malawi (Malcomb et al. 2014) | not-checkable | validation/reference-fig4-ta-classes.geojson |
human | unverified |